The
accessibility issue I’ll like to take is alternative modes of presenting
information (auditory, visual, text) and color blindness. I plan to use following alternative
techniques to present the information:
Providing
text equivalent for every non-text items- As the mouse is rolled over the
graphic, animation, charts, image or map, the Internet explore shows the text
box describing the information conveyed.
The assistive technology devices (screen readers and Braille displays)
can read the text associated with the image. For the detailed text explanation
of charts and graphs, there can be a linked page.
Transcription
of audio and video content- This technique is useful for people with vision and
hearing impairments. The transcript can be synchronous, i.e. plays with the
audio or video content, also called as captions, or can be, what is known as
audio descriptions. It only displays important information from the video or
audio of a multimedia presentation. The transcripts may or may not be the part
of the same webpage.
Use
of context and markup to convey any information when color is used: Cognizance
of the combinations of foreground and background colors by choosing highly
contrastive colors for the foreground and background. It is also very important
because people with different types of color deficits or for people who are
using monochrome displays need to have sufficient contrast.
I
will take up the role of a content specialist and I would like to be the part
technology team. The reason is that I’m not a pure technologist, so I better be
assisting a technologist.
References:
Wendy
Chisholm, T. R. &. D. C. (1999). Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0.
Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/.
Beyers,
C. (2002) Interactive Assessment and Course Transformation Using Web-Based
Tools http://technologysource.org/article/interactive_assessment_and_course_transformation_using_webbased_tools/
No comments:
Post a Comment